Friday 19 July 2024

Want to Learn How to "Read" a Price Chart? Start Here.

See how Elliott wave patterns "subsume" other technical analysis chart patterns

By Elliott Wave International

Some investors who are fans of technical analysis may not realize that another way to look at many classic chart patterns -- for example, Head and Shoulders -- is to describe them in terms of Elliott waves.

What this means is that once you've learned Elliott wave analysis, by proxy you've learned most other technical analysis chart patterns that simply go by different names!

It's a huge time saver.

In August and October 2005, as well as February 2006, Robert Prechter's Elliott Wave Theorist discussed several chart patterns and showed two examples (with an introductory quote from the August 2005 Elliott Wave Theorist):

The acknowledged "bible" of traditional chart interpretation is Technical Analysis of Stock Trends (1948) by Robert Edwards and MIT alumnus John Magee. ... The discussion here utilizes the fifth edition (1966).

Edwards and Magee collected others' observations about chart patterns and added their own, producing a comprehensive list of forms against which we may compare related aspects of the Wave Principle. It may not be necessary that we undergo this exercise, as these authors observed and displayed these patterns exclusively in charts of individual stocks, not in the averages where the Wave Principle is deemed best to apply. Nevertheless, because many chartists use the same forms for general market interpretation and since the Wave Principle has some applicability to individual stocks, this exercise is important in order to determine if there are any valid market patterns outside the forms of the Wave Principle.

Head and Shoulders Top

Figure 8a shows Edwards and Magee's depiction of a head and shoulders top, and Figure 8b is Figure 7-4 from Elliott Wave Principle. In a normal wave development, wave five of 3 and wave 4 form the "left shoulder" of the pattern, wave 5 and wave A form the "head," and wave B and wave one of C form the "right shoulder." Wave two of C creates the return to the neckline that is typical of the pattern.

Symmetrical Triangle

The Wave Principle covers the chartist's "symmetrical triangle." As you can see in Figures 11a and 11b, Edwards and Magee's example is a perfect rendition of Elliott's description, right down to the five subwaves.

Edwards and Magee claim, "Prices may move out of a Symmetrical Triangle either up or down. There is seldom if ever...any clue as to the direction...." Elliott's form is more specifically defined, and its position in the market structure and therefore its implications are more definite.

Even though just two examples were shown here, hopefully, you get a flavor of what was presented in 2005 and 2006 -- and an idea of the quality of analysis which our Financial Forecast Service regularly offers.

Realize that a chart pattern -- even though it's "classic" -- offers no guarantees -- and the same with the Wave Principle.

Yet, keep in mind this adaptation of a Q&A with Robert Prechter from an issue of The Elliott Wave Theorist:

Q: Do you believe that the Wave Principle provides for an objective form of analysis? Two different people can look at the same chart and derive very different wave counts. There are market watchers who say that applying wave theory is very subjective.

A: I always ask, "compared to what?" There is no group more subjective than conventional analysts who look at the same "fundamental" news event [like] a war, the level of interest rates, the P/E ratio, GDP reports, the President's economic policy, the Fed's monetary policy, you name it and come up with countless opposing conclusions. They generally don't even bother to study the data. The Wave Principle is an excellent basis for assessing probabilities regarding future market movement. Probabilities are by nature different from certainties. Some people misinterpret this aspect of analysis as subjectivity, but all probabilities may be put in order objectively according to the rules and guidelines of wave formation.

If you're unfamiliar with Elliott wave analysis, read Frost & Prechter's Elliott Wave Principle: Key to Market Behavior, which is the definitive text on the subject. Here's a quote from the book:

[Ralph N.] Elliott recognized that not news, but something else forms the patterns evident in the market. Generally speaking, the important analytical question is not the news per se, but the importance the market places or appears to place on the news. In periods of increasing optimism, the market's apparent reaction to an item of news is often different from what it would have been if the market were in a downtrend. It is easy to label the progression of Elliott waves on a historical price chart, but it is impossible to pick out, say, the occurrences of war, the most dramatic of human activities, on the basis of recorded stock market action. The psychology of the market in relation to the news, then, is sometimes useful, especially when the market acts contrarily to what one would "normally" expect.

If you'd like to read the entire online version of Elliott Wave Principle: Key to Market Behavior, you can get complimentary access by following this link: Elliott Wave Principle: Key to Market Behavior.

This article was syndicated by Elliott Wave International and was originally published under the headline Want to Learn How to "Read" a Price Chart? Start Here.. EWI is the world's largest market forecasting firm. Its staff of full-time analysts led by Chartered Market Technician Robert Prechter provides 24-hour-a-day market analysis to institutional and private investors around the world.

Thursday 18 July 2024

What You Can Learn from Europe's "Dow Theory"-esque Non-confirmation

By Brian Whitmer | European Financial Forecast editor

Charles Dow (yes, the one with the averages named after him) developed a foundational concept in technical analysis that requires that price movement in industrial stocks and transportation shares confirm one another.

The main condition for a Dow Theory non-confirmation occurs when one sector makes a new extreme absent the other. Its classic application is observing the position of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, an index of 30 "industrial" stocks, versus the position of the Dow Jones Transportation Average, an index of 20 "transportation" stocks. In essence, whenever one index fails to keep up with the other, in either direction, it suggests an impending reversal.

These concepts can be applied universally.

For example, right now over in Britain, the FTSE 100's divergence with the FTSE 350 Transportation Index just pushed to 29 months.

Britain's Longest Nonconfirmation to Date

This is a far more prolonged Dow Theory non-confirmation than that seen in July 2007 (seven months) or December 1999 (17 months). In 1999, the FTSE 100 eventually collapsed 53%, while the FTSE 350 Transports fell 66%. In 2007, the resulting declines were 49% and 77%, respectively.

In our view, Britain's prolonged non-confirmation makes sense given a host of investor psychology and other extremes we've been tracking, not just in Europe but around the globe. If you want to stay up-to-date on our findings regarding the position of stocks and bond markets, currencies and the broad economic trends, check out some of our free must-read issues on www.elliottwave.com.

Thursday 11 July 2024

Are You a "Betting Man"? Then Take a Look -- and Make Your Bet.

By Murray Gunn | Global Rates & Money Flows editor

I have spent much of my career among professional traders. By nature, traders are a betting crowd; if they can't bet on the markets, they'll bet on something else.

A monthly highlight on trading floors was always the 'NFP Sweepstake,' where everyone would pay some money to guess what the U.S. Non-Farm Payroll (NFP) number would be. The winner, who would take the whole pot, was the guess that came closest to the actual number. A good strategy, therefore, would be to try and be either the highest or lowest number because, sometimes, NFPs do surprise.

That was the case last month when NFPs came in showing that 272,000 jobs were added in May compared with a consensus forecast of 185,000. Momentum in the U.S. labor market is waning, though. From January 2021 to December 2022 the average NFP number was 490,000 jobs added each month. From January 2023, the monthly average has halved to 241,000. The unemployment rate has increased from 3.4% in April 2023 to 4.1% now and jobless claims are rising.

US Full Time Employment chart 1970-2020

The chart above shows annualized percentage change in those in the U.S. engaged in full-time employment. Full-time employment has been shrinking on an annualized basis since February this year, and you can see that every one of the eight recessions (the shaded areas on the chart) since 1970 has been accompanied by a negative reading. On three occasions, this metric has dipped into negative territory without a recession occurring.

I'm no expert bookie, but it seems to me that those odds tilt towards favoring a recession. What do you think?

The U.S. jobs market remains the most important economic variable on the planet given the importance of the U.S. consumer to economic activity. Regardless of where in the world you live or invest, staying ahead of the trends in the U.S. stock market and economy is worth your while. Elliott Wave International has a free must-read issue on U.S stocks that I suggest you check out, on www.elliottwave.com.